ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
Section
PART
I—GENERAL RULES
1.
Questions of law
2.
Questions of fact
3.
Preliminary facts
4.
Preliminary facts in issue
5.
Erroneous admission or exclusion of evidence
6.
Objections to evidence
7.
Corroboration
8.
Power of court to exclude evidence
9.
Judicial notice
PART
II—BURDEN OF PROOF
10.
Burden of persuasion defined
11.
Burden of producing evidence defined
12.
Proof by a preponderance of the probabilities
13.
Proof of crime
14.
Allocation of burden of persuasion
15.
Burden of persuasion in particular cases
16.
Instruction on burden of persuasion
17.
Allocation of burden of producing evidence
PART
III—PRESUMPTIONS
18.
Presumption and inference defined
19.
Prima facie evidence
20.
Effect of rebuttable presumptions
21.
Procedure in applying rebuttable presumptions where proof by a
preponderance of the probabilities is required.
22.
Effect of certain presumptions in criminal actions
23.
Procedure in applying presumptions in criminal actions tried
by jury.
24.
Conclusive presumptions
25.
Facts recited in written instrument
26.
Estoppel by own statement or conduct
27.
Estoppel of tenant to deny title of landlord
28.
Estoppel of licensee to deny title of licensor
29.
Estoppel of bailee, agent or licensee
30.
Rebuttable presumptions
31.
Marriage
32.
Children of a marriage
33.
Death after seven years' absence
34.
Simultaneous death
35.
Owner of legal title is owner of beneficial title
36.
Transfer by trustee
37.
Official duty regularly performed
38.
Ordinary consequences of voluntary act
39.
Judicial jurisdiction
40.
Foreign law
41.
Continuation
42.
Full age and sound body
43.
Thing delivered
44.
Obligation delivered
45.
Possession of order to pay or deliver
46.
Possession of obligation by creditor
47.
Prior payment of rent
48.
Ownership
49.
Partners, landlord and tenant, principal and agent
50.
Judgments when not conclusive
PART
IV—RELEVANCY
51.
Relevant evidence admissible
52.
Discretion to exclude relevant evidence
53.
Evidence of character not admissible to prove conduct
54.
Methods of proving character
55.
Routine practice
56.
Remedial and precautionary measures
57.
Offers to plead guilty, withdrawn pleas of guilty
PART
V—WITNESSES
58.
Every person competent
59.
Disqualification of witnesses
60.
Personal knowledge required
61.
Oath or affirmation required
62.
Cross-examination
63.
Statement of accused
64.
Interpreters
65.
Presiding judge disqualified as witness
66.
Competency of jurors
67.
Qualification as an expert
68.
Court may call and examine witnesses
69.
Court controls mode and order of interrogation
70.
Leading questions
71.
Cross-examination of non-adverse witness
72.
Adverse witness in civil action
73.
Scope of re-examination
74.
Examination as to writings
75.
Prior inconsistent statement or conduct
76.
Extrinsic evidence of prior inconsistent statement
77.
Writing used to refresh memory
78.
Exclusion of witnesses
79
Recall of witness
80.
Attacking or supporting credibility
81.
Any party may attack or support credibility
82.
Extrinsic evidence affecting credibility
83.
Character traits affecting credibility
84.
Specific instances of conduct affecting credibility
85.
Previous convictions affecting credibility
86.
Reasonable grounds for impeachment
PART
VI—PRIVILEGES
87.
Application of this Part
88.
Privilege recognised only as provided
89.
Waiver
90.
Comment and inferences as to exercise of privilege
91.
Determination and enforcement of privilege
92.
Disclosure of privileged information in ruling on claim of
privilege.
93.
Communications presumed confidential
94.
Error in allowing privilege
95.
Effect of error in disallowing privilege
96.
Privilege of an accused
97.
Privilege against self-incrimination
98.
Disclosure of things owned by another
99.
Required reports
100.
Lawyer-client privilege
101.
Exceptions to lawyer-client privilege
102.
Work produced by a lawyer for a client
103.
Mental treatment
104.
Religious advice
105.
Compromise
106.
State secrets
107.
Informants
108.
Trade secrets
109.
Political vote
110.
Marital communications
PART
VII—OPINION
111.
Lay opinion
112.
Expert opinion
113.
Basis of expert opinion
114.
Court experts
115.
Opinion on ultimate issue
PART
VIII—HEARSAY
116.
Hearsay defined
117.
Hearsay not admissible
118.
First hand hearsay
119.
Admissions
120.
Confessions
121.
Former testimony
122.
Past recollection recorded
123.
State of mind
124.
Res gestae
125.
Business records
126.
Official records
127.
Judgments
128.
Family history
129.
Boundaries and community history
130.
Deeds and ancient writings
131.
Reputation concerning character
132.
Reference works
133.
Credibility of declarant
134.
Examination of declarant
135.
Discretionary exclusion if declarant available
PART
IX—AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION
136.
Authentication
137.
Authentication by admission
138.
Authentication by statute
139.
Authentication by testimony of witness with knowledge
140.
Authentication by non-expert opinion on handwriting
141.
Authentication by comparison by court or witness
142.
Voice identification
143.
Identification by telephone
144.
Authentication by distinctive characteristics
145.
Authentication by reply
146.
Ancient documents
147.
Authentication by process or system
148.
Authentication of public reports and records
149.
Business records
150.
Attested writings
151.
Public publications
152.
Law reports and treatises
153.
Maps and charts
154.
Ghana Gazette
155.
Reference books
156.
Newspapers and periodicals
157.
Signs and labels
158.
Acknowledged writings
159.
Seals
160.
Domestic official signatures
161.
Foreign official signatures
162.
Copies of writings in official custody
PART
X—WRITINGS
163.
Original writings
164.
Duplicates
165.
Evidence of content of a writing
166.
Duplicate sometimes treated as original
167.
Originals lost
168.
Originals unavailable by judicial means
169.
Originals under control of an opponent
170.
Collateral writings
171.
Voluminous writings
172.
Immovable writings
173.
Admitted writings
174.
Copy sometimes treated as original.
175.
Copies of official writings
176.
Bankers' books
177.
Extrinsic evidence affecting the contents of a writing
PART
XI—MISCELLANEOUS
178.
Application
179.
Interpretation
180.
Repeals and amendments
181.
Commencement.
SCHEDULE
Schedule
IN
pursuance of the National Redemption Council (Establishment)
Proclamation, 1972 this Decree is hereby made:
PART
I—GENERAL RULES
Section 1—Questions of Law.
(1)
All questions of law, including but not limited to the
admissibility of evidence and the construction of this Decree,
are to be decided by the court.
(2)
The determination of the law of an organisation of states to
the extent that such law is not part of the law of Ghana, or
of the law of a foreign state or sub-division of a foreign
state, is a question of fact, but it shall be determined by
the court.
(3)
The determination whether a party has met the burden of
producing evidence on a particular issue is a question of law
to be determined by the court.
(4)
Where the court determines that a party has not met the burden
of producing evidence on a particular issue the court shall as
a matter of law determine that issue against that party.
Section 2—Questions of Fact.
(1)
Except as otherwise provided in this or any other enactment in
a jury trial all questions of fact are to be decided by the
jury.
(2)
Nothing in this section shall preclude the court from summing
up the evidence to the jury or from commenting on the weight
or credibility of the evidence so long as the court makes it
clear to the jury that they are to determine the weight and
credibility of the evidence themselves and are not bound by
the court's summary or comments.
(3)
Where there is no jury, all questions of fact shall be decided
by the court.
Section 3—Preliminary Facts.
(1)
For the purposes of this section and section 4, a
"preliminary fact" is any fact upon which depends the
admissibility or inadmissibility of evidence, the
qualification or disqualification of a person to be a witness,
or the existence or non-existence of a privilege.
(2)
The court shall determine the existence or non-existence of
all preliminary facts.
(3) A
ruling on the admissibility or inadmissibility of evidence,
the qualification or disqualification of a person to be a
witness, or the existence or non-existence of a privilege
implies whatever finding of fact is prerequisite to it, and
unless otherwise provided by any enactment no separate formal
finding of fact is necessary.
(4)
Any party, and as to a claim of privilege the person claiming
the privilege, is entitled to present evidence and arguments
relevant to a determination under subsection (2).
(5)
In making a determination under subsection (2), the court may
hear the evidence and arguments and announce its determination
in the absence of the jury, and shall hear the evidence and
arguments and announce its determination in the absence of the
jury if the determination concerns any matter admissible only
under section 120 relating to confessions.
(6)
Unless otherwise provided by this Decree, the court may admit
evidence which requires proof of preliminary facts without
prior proof of the preliminary facts on the condition that the
preliminary facts will be proved later in the course of the
trial; but such conditionally admitted evidence shall be
disregarded if the court determines that the preliminary facts
were not proved.
Section 4—Preliminary Facts in Issue.
(1)
When a preliminary fact is also a fact in issue in the action:
(a) the court or jury, as the tribunal of
fact, shall not be bound by the court's determination of the
existence or non-existence of the preliminary fact, and
(b) a determination by the tribunal of fact
that differs from the court's determination of the existence
or non-existence of the preliminary fact shall not require the
tribunal of fact to disregard any admitted evidence or affect
any ruling admitting or excluding evidence.
(2)
Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude the
introduction of evidence relevant to the weight or credibility
of admitted evidence or to preclude the tribunal of fact from
considering such evidence.
Section 5—Erroneous Admission or Exclusion of Evidence.
(1) No
finding, verdict, judgment or decision shall be set aside,
altered or reversed on appeal or review because of the
erroneous admission of evidence unless the erroneous admission
of evidence resulted in a substantial miscarriage of justice.
(2) In
determining whether an erroneous admission of evidence
resulted in a substantial miscarriage of justice the court
shall consider—
(a) whether the trial court relied on that
inadmissible evidence; and
(b) whether an objection to or a motion to
exclude, to strike out the evidence could and should have been
made at an earlier stage in the action; and
(c) whether the objection or motion could
and should have been so stated as to make clear its ground or
grounds; and
(d) whether the admitted evidence should
have been excluded on one of the grounds stated in connection
with the objection or motion; and
(e) whether the decision would have been
otherwise but for that erroneous admission of evidence.
(3)
No finding, verdict, judgment or decision shall be set aside,
altered or reversed on appeal or review because of the
erroneous exclusion of evidence unless—
(a) the substance of the excluded evidence
was made known to the court by the questions asked, an offer
of proof, or by any other means; and
(b) the court which decides on the effect
of the error also determines that the excluded evidence should
have been admitted and that the erroneous exclusion of the
evidence resulted in a substantial miscarriage of justice.
Section 6—Objections to Evidence.
(1)
In every action, and at every stage thereof, any objection to
the admissibility of evidence by a party affected thereby
shall be made at the time the evidence is offered.
(2)
Every objection to the admissibility of evidence shall be
recorded and ruled upon by the court as a matter of course.
(3)
Where a document is produced and tendered in evidence, and
rejected by the court, it shall be marked by the court as
having been so tendered and rejected.
Section 7—Corroboration.
(1)
Corroboration consists of evidence from which a reasonable
inference can be drawn which confirms in some material
particular the evidence to be corroborated and connects the
relevant person with the crime, claim or defence.
(2)
Evidence may in proper circumstances be corroborated by other
independent evidence that requires corroboration.
(3)
Unless otherwise provided by this or any other enactment,
corroboration of admitted evidence is not necessary to sustain
any finding of fact or any verdict.
(4)
No finding, verdict, judgment or decision shall be set aside,
altered or reversed on appeal or review on the sole ground
that the court failed to caution itself or the jury as to the
danger of acting on uncorroborated evidence unless the
appellate court is satisfied that such failure resulted in a
substantial miscarriage of justice.
(5)
Nothing in this section shall preclude the court or any party
from commenting on the danger of acting on uncorroborated
evidence or commenting on the weight and credibility of
admitted evidence or preclude the tribunal of fact from
considering the weight and credibility of admitted evidence.
Section 8—Power of Court to Exclude Evidence.
Evidence that would be inadmissible if objected to by a party
may be excluded by the court on its own motion.
Section 9—Judicial Notice.
(1)
This section governs the taking of judicial notice of facts in
issue or facts which are relevant to facts in issue.
(2)
Judicial notice can be taken only of facts which are either:
(a) so generally known within the
territorial jurisdiction of the court, or
(b) so capable of accurate and ready
determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot
reasonably be questioned,
that
the fact is not subject to reasonable dispute.
(3)
Judicial notice may be taken whether requested or not.
(4)
Judicial notice shall be taken if requested by a party and the
requesting party:
(a) gives each adverse party fair notice of
the request, through the pleadings or otherwise, and
(b) supplies the necessary sources and
information to the court.
(5) A
party shall be entitled upon timely request to an opportunity
to present to the court information relevant to the propriety
of taking judicial notice and the meaning of the fact to be
noticed.
(6)
Judicial notice may be taken at any stage of the action.
(7)
In an action tried by jury the court may, and upon timely
request shall, instruct the jury to accept as conclusive any
facts which have been judicially noticed.
PART
II—BURDEN OF PROOF
Section 10—Burden of Persuasion Defined.
(1)
For the purposes of this Decree, the burden of persuasion
means the obligation of a party to establish a requisite
degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the tribunal
of fact or the court.
(2)
The burden of persuasion may require a party to raise a
reasonable doubt concerning the existence or non-existence of
a fact or that he establish the existence or non-existence of
a fact by a preponderance of the probabilities or by proof
beyond a reasonable doubt.
Section 11—Burden of Producing Evidence Defined.
(1)
For the purposes of this Decree, the burden of producing
evidence means the obligation of a party to introduce
sufficient evidence to avoid a ruling against him on the
issue.
(2)
In a criminal action the burden of producing evidence, when it
is on the prosecution as to any fact which is essential to
guilt, requires the prosecution to produce sufficient evidence
so that on all the evidence a reasonable mind could find the
existence of the fact beyond a reasonable doubt.
(3)
In a criminal action the burden of producing evidence, when it
is on the accused as to any fact the converse of which is
essential to guilt, requires the accused to produce sufficient
evidence so that on all the evidence a reasonable mind could
have a reasonable doubt as to guilt.
(4) In
other circumstances the burden of producing evidence requires
a party to produce sufficient evidence so that on all the
evidence a reasonable mind could conclude that the existence
of the fact was more probable than its non-existence.
Section 12—Proof by a Preponderance of the Probabilities.
(1)
Except as otherwise provided by law, the burden of persuasion
requires proof by a preponderance of the probabilities.
(2)
"Preponderance of the probabilities" means that degree of
certainty of belief in the mind of the tribunal of fact or the
court by which it is convinced that the existence of a fact is
more probable than its non-existence.
Section 13—Proof of Crime.
(1)
In any civil or criminal action the burden of persuasion as to
the commission by a party of a crime which is directly in
issue requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
(2)
Except as provided in section 15 (3), in a criminal action the
burden of persuasion, when it is on the accused as to any fact
the converse of which is essential to guilt, requires only
that the accused raise a reasonable doubt as to guilt.
Section 14—Allocation of Burden of Persuasion.
Except
as otherwise provided by law, unless and until it is shifted a
party has the burden of persuasion as to each fact the
existence or non-existence of which is essential to the claim
or defence he is asserting.
Section 15—Burden of Persuasion in Particular Cases.
(1)
Unless and until it is shifted, the party claiming that a
person is guilty of crime or wrongdoing has the burden of
persuasion on that issue.
(2)
Unless and until it is shifted, the party claiming that a
person did not exercise a requisite degree of care has the
burden of persuasion on that issue.
(3)
Unless and until it is shifted, the party claiming that any
person, including himself, is or was insane or of unsound mind
has the burden of persuasion on that issue.
Section 16—Instruction on Burden of Persuasion.
The
court on all proper occasions shall instruct the jury as to
which party bears the burden of persuasion on each issue and
as to whether that burden requires that a party raise a
reasonable doubt concerning the existence or non-existence of
a fact or that he establish the existence or non-existence of
a fact by a preponderance of the probabilities or by proof
beyond a reasonable doubt.
Section 17—Allocation of Burden of Producing Evidence.
(1)
Except as otherwise provided by law, the burden of producing
evidence of a particular fact is on the party against whom a
finding on that fact would be required in the absence of
further proof.
(2)
Except as otherwise provided by law, the burden of producing
evidence of a particular fact is initially on the party with
the burden of persuasion as to that fact.
PART
III—PRESUMPTIONS
Section 18—Presumption and Inference Defined.
(1) A
presumption is an assumption of fact that the law requires to
be made from another fact or group of facts found or otherwise
established in the action.
(2) An
inference is a deduction of fact that may logically and
reasonably be drawn from another fact or group of facts found
or otherwise established in the action.
(3) A
presumption is either conclusive or rebuttable.
Section 19—Prima Facie Evidence.
An
enactment providing that a fact or group of facts is prima
facie evidence of another fact creates a rebuttable
presumption.
Section 20—Effect of Rebuttable Presumptions.
A
rebuttable presumption imposes upon the party against whom it
operates the burden of producing evidence and the burden of
persuasion as to the non-existence of the presumed fact.
Section 21—Procedure in Applying Rebuttable Presumptions Where
Proof by a Preponderance of the Probabilities is Required.
In an
action where proof by a preponderance of the probabilities is
required:
(a) a rebuttable presumption requires the
tribunal of fact to assume the existence of the presumed fact
unless and until the party against whom the presumption
operates proves that the non-existence of the presumed fact is
more probable than its existence;
(b) when no evidence is introduced contrary
to the existence of the presumed fact, the question of the
existence of the presumed fact depends upon the existence of
the basic facts that give rise to the presumption and is
determined as follows:—
(i) if reasonable minds would necessarily
agree that, the evidence renders the existence of the basic
facts more probable than not, the court shall find, or direct
the jury to find, in favour of the existence of the presumed
fact, or
(ii) if reasonable minds would necessarily
agree that the evidence does not render the existence of the
basic facts more probable than not, the court shall find, or
direct the jury to find, against the existence of the
presumed fact, or
(iii) if reasonable minds would not
necessarily agree as to whether the evidence renders the
existence of the basic facts more probable than not, the court
shall find, or submit the matter to the jury with an
instruction that it shall find, in favour of the existence of
the presumed fact if it finds from the evidence that the
existence of the basic facts is more probable than not, but
otherwise, it shall find against the existence of the presumed
fact;
(c) where evidence is introduced contrary
to the existence of the presumed fact, when reasonable minds
would necessarily agree that the evidence renders the
existence of the basic facts that give rise to the presumption
more probable than not, the question of the existence of the
presumed fact is determined as follows:—
(i) if reasonable minds would necessarily
agree that the evidence renders the non-existence of the
presumed fact more probable than not, the court shall find, or
direct the jury to find, against the existence of the presumed
fact, or
(ii) if reasonable minds would necessarily
agree that the evidence does not render the non-existence of
the presumed fact more probable than not, the court shall
find, or shall direct the jury to find in favour of the
presumed fact, or
(iii) if reasonable minds would not
necessarily agree as to whether the evidence renders the
non-existence of the presumed fact more probable than not, the
court shall find, or submit the matter to the jury with an
instruction that it shall find, in favour of the existence of
the presumed fact unless it finds from the evidence that the
non-existence of the presumed fact is more probable than its
existence, in which case it shall find against the existence
of the presumed fact;
(d) when evidence as to the existence of
the basic facts that give rise to the presumption is such that
reasonable minds would not necessarily agree whether their
existence is more probable than not and evidence as to the
non-existence of the presumed fact is such that they would not
necessarily agree that its non-existence is more probable than
not, the court shall find, or submit the matter to the jury
with an instruction that it shall find, in favour of the
existence of the presumed fact if it finds from the evidence
that the existence of the basic facts is more probable than
not and it does not find the non-existence of the presumed
fact more probable than not, but otherwise it shall find
against the existence of the presumed fact.
Section 22—Effect of Certain Presumptions in Criminal Actions.
In a
criminal action a presumption operates against the accused as
to a fact which is essential to guilt only if the existence of
the basic facts that give rise to the presumption are found or
otherwise established beyond a reasonable doubt, and
thereupon, in the case of a rebuttable presumption, the
accused need only raise a reasonable doubt as to the existence
of the presumed fact.
Section 23—Procedure in Applying Presumptions in Criminal
Actions Tried by Jury.
In a
criminal action tried by jury—
(a) the court shall not direct the jury to
find a presumed fact against the accused if that fact is
essential to guilt, unless on all the evidence a reasonable
mind could have no reasonable doubt either as to the existence
of the basic facts that give rise to the presumption or as to
the existence of the presumed fact;
(b) when the presumed fact is essential to
guilt the court may submit the question of the existence of
the presumed fact to the jury, if, but only if, on all the
evidence a reasonable mind could find both the existence of
the basic facts that give rise to the presumption and the
existence of the presumed fact beyond a reasonable doubt;
(c) when the presumed fact is not essential
to guilt the question of the existence of the presumed fact
may be submitted to the jury if the basic facts that give rise
to the presumption are established or otherwise supported by
evidence sufficient to meet the burden of producing evidence;
(d) whenever the jury is asked to determine
the existence of a presumed fact against the accused if that
fact is essential to guilt, the court shall instruct the jury
that they shall find against the existence of the presumed
fact unless they find both the existence of the basic facts
that give rise to the presumption and the existence of the
presumed fact beyond a reasonable doubt.
Section 24—Conclusive Presumptions.
(1)
Where the basic facts that give rise to a conclusive
presumption are found or otherwise established in the action,
no evidence contrary to the conclusively presumed fact may be
considered by the tribunal of fact.
(2)
Conclusive presumptions include, but are not limited to those
provided in sections 25 to 29.
Section 25—Facts Recited in Written Instrument.
(1)
Except as otherwise provided by law, including a rule of
equity, the facts recited in a written document are
conclusively presumed to be true as between the parties to the
instrument, or their successors in interest.
(2)
This section does not apply to the recital of consideration.
Section 26—Estoppel by Own Statement or Conduct.
Except
as otherwise provided by law, including a rule of equity, when
a party has, by his own statement, act or omission,
intentionally and deliberately caused or permitted another
person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon such
belief, the truth of that thing shall be conclusively presumed
against that party or his successors in interest in any
proceedings between that party or his successors in interest
and such relying person or his successors in interest.
Section 27—Estoppel of Tenant to Deny Title of Landlord.
Except
as otherwise provided by law, including a rule of equity,
against any claim by a tenant the title of his landlord at the
time of the commencement of their relation is conclusively
presumed to be valid.
Section 28—Estoppel of Licensee to Deny Title of Licensor.
Except
as otherwise provided by law, including a rule of equity,
against any claim by a licensee of immovable property his
licensor is conclusively presumed to have a valid right to
possession of the immovable property.
Section 29—Estoppel of Bailee, Agent or Licensee.
Except
as otherwise provided by law, including a rule of equity,
against any claim by a bailee, agent or licensee to whom
movable property has been entrusted, his bailor, principal or
licensor is conclusively presumed to have been entitled to the
movable property at the time it was entrusted; provided that
any such bailee, agent or licensee may show that he was
compelled to deliver up any such movable property to some
person who had a right to it as against his bailor, principal
or licensor, or that his bailor, principal or licensor
wrongfully and without notice to him obtained the movable
property from a third person who has claimed it from him.
Section 30—Rebuttable Presumptions.
Rebuttable presumptions include, but are not limited to, those
provided in sections 31 to 49 and 151 to 162.
Section 31—Marriage.
(1) A
marriage which has been celebrated before witnesses is
presumed to be valid.
(2)
This section applies whether or not the witnesses to the
marriage are called as witnesses in the action.
(3)
This section applies both to monogamous and polygamous
marriages.
Section 32—Children of a Marriage.
(1) A
child born during the marriage of the mother is presumed to be
the child of the person who is the husband of that mother at
the time of the birth.
(2) A
child of a woman who has been married, born within 300 days
after the end of the marriage, is presumed to be a child of
that marriage.
(3)
This section applies both to monogamous and polygamous
marriages.
Section 33—Death After Seven Years' Absence.
(1)
Where a person has not been heard of for seven years despite
diligent effort (whether or not within that period) to find
him, he is presumed to be dead.
(2)
There is no presumption as to the particular time when he
died.
Section 34—Simultaneous Death.
Subject to the provisions of any enactment relating to
succession to property, where two or more persons have died in
circumstances in which it is uncertain which survived the
other, the older is presumed to have predeceased the younger.
Section 35—Owner of Legal Title is Owner of Beneficial Title.
The
owner of the legal title to property is presumed to be the
owner of the full beneficial title.
Section 36—Transfer by Trustee.
A
trustee or other person, whose duty it was to convey immovable
property to a particular person, is presumed to have actually
conveyed to him when such presumption is necessary to perfect
title of such person or his successor in interest.
Section 37—Official Duty Regularly Performed.
(1)
It is presumed that official duty has been regularly
performed.
(2)
This presumption does not apply to an issue as to the
lawfulness of an arrest if it is found or otherwise
established that the arrest was made without a warrant.
Section 38—Ordinary Consequences of Voluntary Act.
(1) A
person is presumed to intend the ordinary consequences of his
voluntary act.
(2)
This section is not applicable in a criminal action to
establish specific intent where specific intent is an element
of the crime charged.
Section 39—Judicial Jurisdiction.
(1)
Any court of Ghana, or any court of general jurisdiction in
any other state or sub-division of a state, or any judge of
such a court, acting as such, is presumed to have acted in the
lawful exercise of its jurisdiction.
(2)
This section applies only when the act of the court or judge
is under collateral attack, namely where the jurisdiction of
the court is not directly in issue.
Section 40—Foreign Law.
The
law of a foreign state is presumed to be the same as the law
of Ghana.
Section 41—Continuation.
A
thing or state of things which has been shown to be in
existence within a period shorter than that within which such
things or states usually cease to exist is presumed to be
still in existence.
Section 42—Full Age and Sound Body.
A
person is presumed to be of full age and of sound body.
Section 43—Thing Delivered.
(1) A
thing delivered by one to another is presumed to have belonged
to the one to whom it was delivered.
(2) In
this section, "thing " includes money.
Section 44—Obligation Delivered.
An
obligation delivered up to the debtor is presumed to have been
paid.
Section 45—Possession of Order to Pay or Deliver.
A
person in possession of an order on himself for the payment of
money, or delivery of a thing, is presumed to have paid the
money or delivered the thing accordingly.
Section 46—Possession of Obligation by Creditor.
An
obligation possessed by the creditor is presumed not to have
been paid.
Section 47—Prior Payment of Rent.
The
payment of earlier rent or instalments is presumed from
receipt for later rent or instalments.
Section 48—Ownership.
(1)
The things which a person possesses are presumed to be owned
by him.
(2) A
person who exercises acts of ownership over property is
presumed to be the owner of it.
Section 49—Partners, Landlord and Tenant, Principal and Agent.
Persons acting as partners, landlord and tenant, or principal
and agent are presumed to stand in that relationship to one
another.
Section 50—Judgments When not Conclusive.
A
judgment, when not conclusive, is presumed to determine or set
forth the rights of the parties correctly, but there is no
presumption that the facts essential to the judgment have been
correctly decided.
PART
IV—RELEVANCY
Section 51—Relevant Evidence Admissible.
(1)
For the purpose of this Decree, "relevant evidence" means
evidence, including evidence relevant to the credibility of a
witness or hearsay declarant, which makes the existence of any
fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action
more or less probable than it would be without the evidence.
(2)
All relevant evidence is admissible except as otherwise
provided by any enactment.
(3) No
evidence is admissible except relevant evidence.
Section 52—Discretion to Exclude Relevant Evidence.
The
court in its discretion may exclude relevant evidence if the
probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed
by—
(a) considerations of undue delay, waste of
time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence; or
(b) the risk that admission of the evidence
will create substantial danger of unfair prejudice or
substantial danger of confusing the issues; or
(c) the risk, in a civil action, where a
stay is not possible or appropriate, that admission of the
evidence will unfairly surprise a party who has not had
reasonable ground to anticipate that such evidence would be
offered.
Section 53—Evidence of Character not Admissible to Prove
Conduct.
Evidence of a person's character or a trait of his character
is not admissible to prove his conduct in conformity with such
character or trait of character on a specific occasion,
except—
(a) in a criminal action evidence of the
character or trait of the character of the accused when
offered by the accused to prove his innocence, or by the
prosecution to rebut such evidence previously introduced by
the accused; or
(b) in a criminal action evidence of the
character or trait of the character of the victim of the
alleged crime when offered by the accused to prove the conduct
of the victim in connection with the alleged crime, or by the
prosecution for the same purpose; or
(c) evidence of the character or a trait of
the character of a witness or hearsay declarant when offered
to support or attack his credibility;
(d) where character or a trait of character
is an essential element of a charge, claim or defence.
Section 54—Methods of Proving Character.
(1)
Except as provided in sections 83 to 85 relating to the
credibility of a witness, and in subsection (2) of this
section, in all circumstances in which evidence of the
character or trait of the character of a person is admissible,
such evidence may only be in the form of an opinion or
evidence of reputation.
(2)
Evidence of the character or a trait of the character of a
person may not be in the form of specific instances of the
person's conduct, except where the character or a trait of
the character of such person is an essential element of a
charge, claim or defence.
(3)
Notwithstanding subsection (2), evidence of specific instances
of the person's conduct, including the commission of a crime
or civil wrong, may be admissible to show such facts as
motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge,
identity, or absence of mistake or accident.
Section 55—Routine Practice.
(1)
Any otherwise admissible evidence of the routine practice of a
person or an organisation is admissible to prove conduct on
specified occasion in conformity with the routine practice.
(2)
Routine practice may be proved by evidence in the form of an
opinion or by evidence of specific conduct on specified
occasions sufficient in number to support a finding of fact
that the practice was routine.
Section 56—Remedial and Precautionary Measures.
(1)
When, after an event, measures are taken which, if taken
previously, would have made the event less likely to occur,
evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove
negligence or culpable conduct in connection with the event.
(2)
This section does not require the excursion of evidence of
subsequent remedial or precautionary measures when offered for
another purpose, such as to show ownership, control or
feasibility of remedial or precautionary measures.
Section 57—Offers to Plead Guilty, Withdrawn Pleas of Guilty.
Evidence of a plea of guilty, later withdrawn, or of an offer
to plead guilty to the crime charged or any other crime is not
admissible in a civil or criminal action involving the person
who made the plea or offer.
PART
V—WITNESSES
Section 58—Every Person Competent.
Except
as otherwise provided by this Decree, every person is
competent to be a witness and no person is disqualified from
testifying to any matter.
Section 59—Disqualification of Witnesses.
(1) A
person is not qualified to be a witness if he is—
(a) incapable of expressing himself so as
to be understood, either directly or through interpretation by
one who can understand him; or
(b) incapable of understanding the duty of
a witness to tell the truth.
(2) A
child or a person of unsound mind is competent to be a witness
unless he is disqualified by subsection (1) of this section.
Section 60—Personal Knowledge Required.
(1) A
witness may not testify to a matter unless sufficient evidence
is introduced to support a finding that he has personal
knowledge of the matter.
(2)
Evidence to prove personal knowledge may, but need not,
consist of the testimony of the witness himself.
(3) A
witness may testify to a matter without proof of personal
knowledge if no objection is raised by any party.
(4)
This section is subject to section 112 relating to opinion
testimony by expert witnesses.
Section 61—Oath or Affirmation Required.
Subject to any enactment or rule of law to the contrary, every
witness before testifying shall take an oath or affirmation
that he will testify truthfully, and any statement made by a
witness without such oath or affirmation shall not be
considered as evidence.
Section 62—Cross-Examination.
(1) At
the trial of an action, a witness can testify only if he is
subject to the examination of all parties to the action, if
they choose to attend and examine.
(2) If
a witness who has testified is not available to be examined
by all the parties to the action who choose to attend and
examine, and the unavailability of the witness has not been
caused by any party who seeks to cross-examine the witness,
the court may in its discretion exclude the entire testimony
or any part of the testimony as fairness requires.
(3)
This section is subject to section 63 relating to certain
statements of an accused.
Section 63—Statement of Accused.
(1) An
accused in a criminal action may make a statement in his own
defence without first taking an oath or affirmation that he
will testify truthfully and without being subject to the
examination of all parties to the action.
(2)
Such a statement by an accused is admissible to the same
extent as if it had been made under oath or affirmation and
subject to examination in accordance with sections 61 and 62.
(3)
The fact that the evidence was given without oath or
affirmation, or that there was no possibility of examination,
may be considered in ascertaining the weight and credibility
of the statement, and may be the subject of comment by the
court, the prosecution or the defence.
Section 64—Interpreters.
(1) A
person called to interpret statements of a witness incapable
of expressing himself so as to be understood directly by the
tribunal of fact is qualified for that purpose if the court is
satisfied that the proposed interpreter can understand and
interpret the expressions of the witness.
(2) A
person who serves as an interpreter in any action is subject
to all of the provisions of this Decree relating to witnesses
except that he may be impeached only as to his ability to
interpret and the accuracy of his interpretation.
Section 65—Presiding Judge Disqualified as a Witness.
A
judge sitting at the trial may not testify as a witness in
that trial.
Section 66—Competency of Jurors.
(1) A
member of the jury may not testify as a witness in the trial
of the action in which he is sitting as a juror.
(2)
Upon an issue of the validity of a verdict, a juror who
participated in rendering that verdict may testify as any
other witness except that he may not testify concerning the
effect of any matter upon the determination of the verdict or
concerning the mental processes by which the verdict was
reached.
(3)
Upon an issue of the validity of a verdict, no statement or
affidavit made by a juror who participated in rendering that
verdict is admissible to the extent that it concerns the
effect of any matter upon the determination of the verdict or
concerns the mental processes by which the verdict was
reached.
Section 67—Qualification as an Expert.
(1) A
person is qualified to testify as an expert if he satisfies
the court that he is an expert on the subject to which his
testimony relates by reason of his special skill, experience
or training.
(2)
Evidence to prove expertise may, but need not, consist of the
testimony of the witness himself.
Section 68—Court May Call and Examine Witnesses.
(1)
The court may, on its own motion or at the request of a party,
call or recall witnesses.
(2)
All parties may cross-examine witnesses called by the court.
(3)
The court may ask questions of witnesses, whether they were
called by a party or the court.
(4) A
party may object to questions asked by the court and to
evidence obtained by the court's questions at any time prior
to the submission of the action to the tribunal of fact for
determination.
(5) A
juror or the jury may, through the court, ask questions of
witnesses which the court itself might ask and which the court
considers proper.
Section 69—Court Controls Mode and Order of Interrogation.
The
court shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and
order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as
to—
(a) make the interrogation and presentation
as rapid, as distinct, and as readily understandable as may
be, and
(b) protect witnesses from being unduly
intimidated, harassed or embarrassed.
Section 70—Leading Questions.
(1) A
"leading question" is a question that suggests directly or
indirectly the answer that the examining party expects or
desires.
(2)
The court may, in its discretion, determine to what extent,
and in what circumstances a party calling a witness shall be
permitted, and a party not calling him shall be forbidden, to
ask leading questions of the witness.
(3)
Subject to the discretion of the court, leading questions may
not, if objected to by an adverse party, be asked in
examination-in-chief, or in re-examination.
(4)
Subject to the discretion of the court, leading questions may
be asked as to matters which are introductory or undisputed,
or which have, in the opinion of the court, been already
sufficiently proved.
(5)
Subject to the discretion of the court, leading questions may
be asked in cross-examination or examination by leave of the
court.
Section 71—Cross-Examination of Non-Adverse Witness.
Subject to the discretion of the court, the cross-examination
of a witness by any party whose interest is not adverse to the
party calling the witness is to be treated as if it were an
examination-in-chief.
Section 72—Adverse Witness in Civil Action.
(1)
Subject to the discretion of the court, in a civil action a
party, or a person whose relationship to a party makes his
interest substantially the same as a party, may be called by
any adverse party and examined as if on cross-examination at
any time during the presentation of evidence by the party
calling the witness.
(2)
When such a witness is cross-examined by his own lawyer or by
a party who is not adverse to the party with whom the witness
is related that examination is to be treated as if it were a
re-examination.
Section 73—Scope of Re-Examination.
(1)
Subject to the discretion of the court, re-examination shall
be directed to the explanation of matters referred to in
cross-examination.
(2) A
witness cannot be re-examined or otherwise further examined as
to the same matter raised by the examining party on a previous
examination without leave granted by the court in its
discretion, but the witness may be re-examined or otherwise
further examined as to any new matter upon which he has been
examined by another party to the action.
Section 74—Examination as to Writing.
(1) In
examining a witness concerning a writing, it is not necessary
to show, read, or disclose to him any part of the writing.
(2) If
the witness is not a party, all parties to the action shall be
given an opportunity, if they choose, to inspect the writing
before any questions concerning it may be asked of the
witness.
Section 75—Prior Inconsistent Statement or Conduct.
In
examining a witness concerning a statement or other conduct by
him that is inconsistent with any part of his testimony at the
trial, it is not necessary to disclose to him any information
concerning the statement or other conduct.
Section 76—Extrinsic Evidence of Prior Inconsistent Statement.
Unless
the court in its discretion determines otherwise, extrinsic
evidence of a statement made by a witness that is inconsistent
with any part of his testimony at the trial shall be excluded
unless—
(a) the witness was so examined while
testifying as to give him an opportunity to explain or to deny
the statement; or
(b) the witness has not been excused from
giving further testimony.
Section 77—Writing Used to Refresh Memory.
(1) If
a witness, either while or before testifying, uses a writing
to refresh his memory with respect to any matter about which
he testifies, the testimony on that matter shall be excluded
if the writing is not produced at the trial unless the court
in its discretion allows the testimony to stand.
(2) If
the writing is produced at the trial, any adverse party may,
if he chooses, inspect the writing, cross-examine the witness
concerning it, and introduce in evidence those parts of it
which relate to the testimony of the witness for the purpose
of attacking his credibility or, if the writing is otherwise
admissible, for any other purpose.
Section 78—Exclusion of Witnesses.
(1)
The court, on its own motion or at the request of a party, may
exclude from the courtroom any witness so that he cannot hear
or see the testimony of other witnesses.
(2)
The court, on its own motion or at the request of a party, may
during any trial take such steps as it considers necessary and
proper for preventing communication with or between witnesses
who are within the court house or its precincts awaiting
examination.
(3)
This section does not authorise the exclusion or sequestration
of a party, a lawyer representing a party at the trial, or any
other person shown by a party to be essential to the
presentation of his case.
Section 79—Recall of Witness.
After
a witness has been excused from giving further testimony in
the action, he cannot be recalled without leave granted by the
court in its discretion.
Section 80—Attacking or Supporting Credibility.
(1)
Except as otherwise provided by this Decree, the court or jury
may, in determining the credibility of a witness, consider any
matter that is relevant to prove or disprove the truthfulness
of his testimony at the trial.
(2)
Matters which may be relevant to the determination of the
credibility of the witness include, but are not limited to the
following:—
(a) the demeanour of the witness;
(b) the substance of the testimony;
(c) the existence or non-existence of any
fact testified to by the witness;
(d) the capacity and opportunity of the
witness to perceive, recollect or relate any matter about
which he testifies;
(e) the existence or non-existence of
bias, interest or other motive;
(f) the character of the witness as to
traits of honesty or truthfulness or their opposites;
(g) a statement or conduct which is
consistent or inconsistent with the testimony of the witness
at the trial;
(h) the statement of the witness admitting
untruthfulness or asserting truthfulness.
Section 81—Any Party May Attack or Support Credibility.
(1)
The credibility of a witness or of any part of his testimony
may be attacked or supported by any party, including the party
calling the witness.
(2)
Where, before he calls the witness, a party has reasonable
grounds to believe that he will want to attack the credibility
of the witness or of any part of his testimony, the party
shall, out of the presence of the witness, notify the court
and every other party of his expectation, except that if the
witness is a party the witness need not be notified.
Section 82—Extrinsic Evidence Affecting Credibility.
Except
as otherwise provided by this Decree, to attack or support the
credibility of a witness evidence other than the testimony of
the witness is admissible if relevant to prove or disprove the
truthfulness of his testimony.
Section 83—Character Traits Affecting Credibility.
(1)
Subject to subsection (2) of this section evidence of good
character to support the credibility of a witness is not
admissible unless evidence which impugns the good character of
the witness has been admitted for the purpose of attacking his
credibility.
(2) An
accused in a criminal action may introduce evidence of good
character to support his credibility, and unless he first
introduces such evidence the prosecution may not attack his
credibility by introducing evidence, including evidence of a
previous conviction to impugn his good character.
(3) A
witness may give his opinion of the character of another
witness and may state whether or not he would believe the
statement of the witness in question.
(4)
For the purpose of attacking or supporting the credibility of
a witness evidence of the reputation of the witness is not
admissible to prove traits of his character.
Section 84—Specific Instances of Conduct Affecting
Credibility.
(1)
Subject to subsection (2) of this section and to section 85,
evidence of specific instance of conduct of a witness relevant
only as tending to prove or disprove traits of his character
is not admissible to attack or support the credibility of the
witness.
(2)
Subject to section 52 relating to limitations on relevant
evidence and to section 69 relating to limitations on
interrogation specific instances of the conduct of a witness
relevant only as tending to prove or disprove traits of his
character may, for the purpose of attacking or supporting his
credibility, be inquired into on cross-examination of the
witness himself or on cross-examination of a witness who
testifies to an opinion of the character of the witness in
question.
Section 85—Previous Convictions Affecting Credibility.
(1)
For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, it
may be shown by the examination of the witness or by record of
the judgment that he has been convicted of a crime involving
dishonesty or false statement, but no conviction for any other
crime may be shown.
(2) A
conviction may not be shown under this section if a period of
more than ten years has elapsed since the date of conviction
or the termination of the sentence imposed by the court for
that conviction, whichever last occurs for that conviction.
(3)
The pendency of an appeal against a conviction does not
prevent the conviction from being shown.
(4) If
a conviction may be shown, the pendency of an appeal against
that conviction may be shown.
Section 86—Reasonable Grounds for Impeachment.
In
attacking or supporting the credibility of a witness, a person
may not ask a question which conveys an adverse imputation
concerning the character of that witness unless he has
reasonable grounds for believing the imputation to be true.
PART
VI—PRIVILEGES
Section 87—Application of this Part.
(1)
The provisions of this Part shall apply in all proceedings.
(2)
The provisions of any enactment or rule of law which make
rules of evidence inapplicable or of limited application in
particular proceedings shall not make this Part inapplicable
to such proceedings.
(3)
For the purpose of this Part a "proceeding" means any action,
investigation, inquiry, hearing, arbitration or fact-finding
procedure, whether judicial, administrative, executive,
legislative or not before a government body, formal or
informal, public or private.
(4)
For the purpose of this Part a "presiding officer" means the
court or the person authorised in the proceeding to rule on a
claim of privilege.
Section 88—Privilege Recognised Only as Provided.
(1)
Except as otherwise provided in this Part or in any other
enactment, no person has a privilege to—
(a) refuse when duly subpoenaed to be a
witness: or
(b) refuse as a witness to disclose any
matter; or
(c) refuse as a witness to produce any
object or writing.
(2)
Except as otherwise provided in this Part or in any other
enactment, no person may prevent another person from being a
witness, from disclosing any matter, or from producing any
object or writing.
Section 89—Waiver.
(1)
Except as otherwise provided in this section, a person who
would otherwise have privilege to refuse to disclose or to
prevent any other person from disclosing a particular matter
has no such privilege if he or any other person while the
holder of the privilege has voluntarily disclosed or consented
to the disclosure of a significant part of that matter.
(2) A
disclosure of a privileged matter where the disclosure itself
is a privileged communication does not affect the right of any
person to claim the privilege.
(3) A
waiver of a joint privilege to refuse to disclose or to
prevent any other person from disclosing a particular matter
by any holder of the joint privilege does not affect the right
of any other holder to claim the privilege.
Section 90—Comment and Inferences as to Exercise of Privilege.
If a
privilege to refuse to disclose, or a privilege to prevent
another from disclosing, a matter is claimed and allowed, the
presiding officer, counsel or the parties may comment thereon
and the tribunal of fact may draw all reasonable inferences
therefrom.
Section 91—Determination and Enforcement of Privilege.
(1)
The presiding officer shall determine a claim of privilege in
the manner provided in Part I of this Decree.
(2) No
person shall be punished for failure to disclose or produce
any matter claimed to be privileged unless he has failed to
comply with an order of court that he disclose or produce the
matter or unless the presiding officer, by law, has the power
to punish for contempt.
Section 92—Disclosure of Privileged Information in Ruling on
Claim of Privilege.
(1)
Subject to subsection (2), the presiding officer may not
require disclosure of information claimed to be privileged in
order to rule on the claim of privilege.
(2)
When a court is ruling on a claim of privilege under section
105, 106 or 107 relating to state secrets, informants, and
trade secrets and is unable to do so without requiring
disclosure of the information claimed to be privileged, the
court may require the person from whom disclosure is sought or
a person authorised to claim the privilege, or both, to
disclose the information in chambers out of the presence and
hearing of all persons except the person authorised to claim
the privilege and such other person as the person authorised
to claim the privilege is willing to have present.
(3) If
the judge determines that the information is privileged,
neither he nor any other person shall ever disclose, without
consent of a person authorised to permit disclosure, what was
disclosed in the course of the proceedings in chambers.
Section 93—Communications Presumed Confidential.
Whenever a privilege is claimed to refuse to disclose or to
prevent any other person from disclosing a confidential
communication protected from disclosure under this Part, the
communication is presumed to have been made in confidence and
the opponent of the claim has the burden of persuasion to
establish that the communication was not confidential.
Section 94—Error in Allowing Privilege.
A
party may, on appeal or review, allege error on a ruling
disallowing a claim of privilege only if he is the holder of
the privilege.
Section 95—Effect of Error in Disallowing Privilege.
Evidence of a statement or other disclosure of privileged
matter that was compelled to be disclosed in any proceeding by
an erroneous ruling disallowing a claim of privilege is
inadmissible against a holder of the privilege in any later
proceeding or in any re-hearing of the original proceeding.
Section 96—Privilege of an Accused.
(1)
The accused in a criminal action shall not be called as a
witness and shall not be compelled to testify except on his
own application.
(2)
Except as otherwise provided in this Decree, if the accused in
a criminal action testifies on his own behalf he shall be
subject to examination in the same manner as any other
witness.
(3) An
accused in a criminal action has no privilege to refuse to
submit his body to examination by the court or the tribunal of
fact or to refuse to do any act in their presence for the
purpose of identification other than to testify.
(4) If
an accused in a criminal action does not testify on his own
behalf, the court, the prosecution and the defence may
comment upon the accused's failure to testify, and the
tribunal of fact may draw all reasonable inferences therefrom.
Section 97—Privilege Against Self-incrimination.
(1) In
any proceeding a person has a privilege to refuse to disclose
any matter or to produce any object or writing that will
incriminate him.
(2) No
person has a privilege under subsection (1), where the court
thinks that it is necessary to the determination of an issue,
to refuse—
(a) to submit his body to examination for
the purpose of discovering or recording his corporal features
and other identifying characteristics, or his physical or
mental condition; or
(b) to furnish or permit the taking of
samples of body fluids or substances for analysis; or
(c) to speak, write, assume a posture,
make a gesture, or do any other act for the purpose of
identification.
(3)
An accused in a criminal action who voluntarily testifies on
his own behalf in the action has no privilege under subsection
(1) to refuse to disclose any matter or produce any object or
writing that is relevant to any issue in the criminal action.
(4) A
matter, object or writing will incriminate a person within the
meaning of this Decree if it—
(a) constitutes, or
(b) forms an essential part of, or
(c) is taken in connection with other
matters already disclosed is a basis for a reasonable
inference of,
a
violation of the criminal laws of Ghana.
(5)
Notwithstanding subsection (4), a matter, object or writing
that would otherwise incriminate a person will not incriminate
him if he has for any reason become permanently immune from
punishment for a violation of the criminal laws of Ghana which
may reasonably be inferred from that matter, object or
writing.
Section 98—Disclosure of Things Owned by Another.
No
person has a privilege under section 97 to refuse to obey an
order made by a court to produce an object or writing under
his control constituting, containing or disclosing matter
which will incriminate him if by law some other person has a
superior right to the object or writing ordered to be
produced.
Section 99—Required Reports.
(1) A
person making a record, report or disclosure required by law
has no privilege to refuse to disclose or to prevent any other
person from disclosing the contents of the record, report or
disclosure except as otherwise specifically provided by any
enactment.
(2) A
public official or public entity to whom a record, report or
disclosure is required by law to be made has a privilege to
refuse to disclose the contents of the record, report or
disclosure if the law requiring it to be made prevents its
disclosure for the purpose in question.
Section 100—Lawyer-Client Privilege.
(1)
For the purpose of this section and sections 93, 101 and 102—
(a) a "client" is a person, including a
public entity, association or body corporate, who directly or
through an authorised representative seeks professional legal
services from a lawyer;
(b) a "representative of the client" is a
person having authority from the client to make to, or receive
from, a lawyer confidential communications relating to
professional legal services sought by the client;
(c) a "representative of the lawyer" is a
person having authority from the lawyer to assist the lawyer
in rendering professional legal services sought by the client;
(d) a communication is "confidential" if
not intended to be disclosed, and made in a manner reasonably
calculated not to disclose its contents, to third persons
other than those to whom disclosure is in furtherance of the
client's interest in seeking professional legal services or
those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the
communication.
(2) A
client has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent
any other person from disclosing a confidential communication,
reasonably related to professional legal services sought by
the client, made between the client or a representative of the
client and the lawyer or a representative of the lawyer, or
between the lawyer and a representative of the lawyer, or
between the lawyer or a representative of the lawyer and a
lawyer representing another person in a matter of common
interest with the client or a representative of such lawyer.
The
client's privilege under subsection (2) may be claimed by—
(a) the client; or
(b) the client's guardian or committee; or
(c) the personal representative of a
deceased client; or
(d) the successor in interest of a client
who was an artificial person; or
(e) the person who was the client's lawyer
at the time of the communication, or the
representative of such lawyer, but such person may not claim
the privilege if there is no other person in existence who is
authorised by paragraph (a), (b), (c) or (d) of this
subsection to claim the privilege or if he is otherwise
instructed to permit disclosure by a person so authorised.
Section 101—Exceptions to Lawyer-Client Privilege.
No
person has a privilege under section 100—
(a) if, apart from the communication,
sufficient evidence has been introduced to support a finding
of fact that the services of the lawyer were sought or
obtained to enable or aid any person to commit or plan to
commit a crime or intentional tort;
(b) as to a communication relevant to an
issue between parties who claim an interest in property
through the same deceased client of the lawyer;
(c ) as to a communication relevant to an
issue of breach of duty by a lawyer to his client or a client
to his lawyer;
(d) as to a communication relevant to the
formalities of the execution of a writing by a client where
the lawyer or a representative of the lawyer is an attesting
witness to the execution of the writing;
(e) as to a communication relevant to a
matter of common interest between two or more clients if the
communication was made by any of them to a lawyer sought by
them in common, when offered in any proceeding between any of
the clients.
Section 102—Work Produced by a Lawyer for a Client.
(1) A
client has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent
any other person from disclosing information obtained or work
produced by his lawyer or a representative of the lawyer in
rendering professional legal services sought by the client.
(2)
The client's privilege under subsection (1) may be claimed by—
(a) the client; or
(b) the client's guardian or committee; or
(c) the personal representative of a
deceased client; or
(d) the successor in interest of a client
who was an artificial person; or
(e) the lawyer who himself or through his
representative obtained the information or produced work, or
the representative of such lawyer, but such lawyer or his
representative may not claim the privilege if there is no
other person in existence who is authorised by paragraph (a),
(b), (c) or (d) of this subsection to claim the privilege or
if he is otherwise directed to permit disclosure by a person
so authorised.
(3) A
court, in its discretion, may disallow a claim of privilege
under subsection (1) if the information sought is not
reasonably available from another source and the value of the
information substantially outweighs the disadvantages caused
by its disclosure.
Section 103—Mental Treatment.
(1) A
person has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent
any other person from disclosing a confidential communication
between himself and a physician or psychologist or any other
persons who are participating in the diagnosis or treatment
under the direction of the physician or psychologist if the
communication was made for the purpose of diagnosis or
treatment of a mental or emotional condition.
(2)
For the purpose of this section a communication is
confidential if it is not intended to be disclosed to third
persons other than those reasonably necessary for the
transmission of the communication or persons who are
participating in the diagnosis or treatment under the
direction of a physician or psychologist.
(3)
The privilege under subsection (1) may be claimed by—
(a) the person himself; or
(b) the person's guardian or committee; or
(c) the person's personal representative
if the person is deceased; or
(d) the person who was the physician or
psychologist or any other person who participated in the
diagnosis or treatment under the direction of the physician or
psychologist, unless he is otherwise instructed to permit
disclosure by a person authorised to claim the privilege by
paragraph (a), (b), (c) or (d) of this subsection.
(4) A
court, in its discretion, may disallow a claim of privilege
under subsection (1) if—
(a) in a proceeding to commit the person
who was the patient, the information sought is relevant to the
determination of whether the person should be committed, or
(b) in a criminal or civil proceeding the
person claiming the privilege raises any matter relating to
his mental or emotional condition, or
(c) a court has ordered the person who was
the patient to submit to an examination of his mental or
emotional condition by a physician or psychologist.
Section 104—Religious Advice.
(1) A
person has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent
any other person from disclosing a confidential communication
by the person to a professional minister of religion who is
prevented from disclosing such communication by the code of
his religion and has been consulted in his professional role
as a spiritual adviser.
(2)
For the purpose of this section, a communication is
confidential if made privately and not intended for further
disclosure.
(3)
The privilege under subsection (1) may be claimed by—
(a) the person himself; or
(b) the person's guardian or committee; or
(c) the person's personal representative
if the person is deceased; or
(d) the professional minister of religion
to whom subsection (1) applies.
Section 105—Compromise.
(1) A
person has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent
any other person from disclosing to the tribunal of fact
information concerning the furnishing, offering or accepting
by such person or his authorised representative of valuable
consideration in compromising a claim which was disputed
either as to validity or amount and information concerning
conduct or statements made as an integral part of such
compromise negotiations.
(2) A
person has no privilege under this section if his, or his
authorised representative's conduct or statements relating to
the compromise were made with the intention that they would
not be privileged from disclosure to a tribunal of fact.
Section 106—State Secrets.
(1)
Except as otherwise provided by section 107 or by any other
enactment, the Government has a privilege to refuse to
disclose and to prevent any person from disclosing a state
secret unless the need to preserve the confidentiality of the
information is outweighed by the need for disclosure in the
interest of justice.
(2) A
"state secret" is information considered confidential by the
Government, that has not been officially disclosed to the
public, and which it would be prejudicial to the security of
the state or injurious to the public interest to disclose.
(3)
The Government's privilege under subsection (1) may be claimed
only by the member of the National Redemption Council
responsible for administering the subject matter which the
secret of state concerns, or by a person authorised in writing
to claim the privilege by such member.
(4) In
an action in a court when the Government's privilege under
subsection (1) is claimed, other than for an official
document, the court may determine the claim itself, or, on its
own motion or at the request of a party or the Government,
shall stay the proceedings and refer the claim of privilege to
the Court of Appeal for determination.
Section 107—Informants.
(1)
The Government has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to
prevent any other person from disclosing the identity of a
person who has supplied to the Government information
purporting to reveal the commission of a crime or a plan to
commit a crime.
(2)
The Government does not under this section have privilege to
refuse to disclose a communication from such a person except
to the extent necessary to protect the identity of the person
from disclosure.
(3)
The Government's privilege under this section may be claimed
by any person authorised by the Government to claim the
privilege.
(4)
The Government has no privilege under this section if the
identity of the informant has been disclosed to the public by
the Government or the informant or if the informant appears as
a witness in court in an action to which his communication
relates.
(5) If
the Government claims its privilege under this section and the
circumstances indicate a reasonable probability that the
informant can give testimony necessary to a fair determination
of guilt or innocence, in a criminal action the court may on
its own motion and shall on the motion of the accused, dismiss
the action.
Section 108—Trade Secrets.
(1)
The owner of a trade secret or a person authorised by the
owner of a trade secret has a privilege to refuse to disclose
and to prevent any other person from disclosing the trade
secret unless the value of the disclosure of the trade secret
substantially outweighs the disadvantages caused by its
disclosure.
(2) In
making his determination as to the existence or otherwise of
the privilege the presiding officer shall consider whether the
trade secret is adequately protected by patent, trade mark,
copyright or other law and whether adequate protection can be
provided by disclosure of the trade secret in chambers or in
any other appropriate manner.
(3)
When disclosure of a trade secret is required a court, on its
own motion or at the request of any party, may take such
actions to protect the trade secret from further disclosure or
unauthorised usage as may be appropriate.
Section 109—Political Vote.
A
person has a privilege to refuse to disclose how he cast his
vote at a public election or referendum conducted by secret
ballot unless sufficient evidence has been introduced to
support a finding of fact that the vote was cast illegally.
Section 110—Marital Communications.
(1) A
person has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent
any other person from disclosing a confidential communication
made between himself and his spouse during their marriage.
(2) A
communication is confidential if not intended to be disclosed,
and made in a manner reasonably calculated not to disclose its
contents, to any third person.
(3)
This section applies to both monogamous and polygamous
marriages.
PART
VII—OPINION
Section 111—Lay Opinion.
(1) A
witness not testifying as an expert may give testimony in the
form of an opinion or inference only if—
(a) the opinion or inference concerns
matters perceived by the witness, and
(b) testimony in the form of an opinion or
inference is helpful to the witness in giving a clear
statement or is helpful to the court or tribunal of fact in
determining any issue.
(2)
The matter on which the witness bases his opinion or inference
need not be disclosed before the witness states his opinion or
inference, unless the court in its discretion determines
otherwise, but he may be examined by any party concerning the
basis for his opinion or inference and he shall then disclose
that basis.
Section 112—Expert Opinion.
If the
subject of the testimony is sufficiently beyond common
experience that the opinion or inference of an expert will
assist the court or tribunal of fact in understanding evidence
in the action or in determining any issue, a witness may give
testimony in the form of an opinion or inference concerning
any subject on which the witness is qualified to give expert
testimony.
Section 113—Basis of Expert Opinion.
(1) A
witness testifying as an expert may base his opinions or
inferences on matters perceived by him or known to him because
of his expertise or on matters assumed by him to be true for
the purpose of giving his opinion or inference.
(2)
The matters on which a witness testifying as an expert bases
his opinion or inference need not be admissible in evidence.
(3)
The matters on which a witness testifying as an expert bases
his opinion or inference need not be disclosed before the
witness states his opinion or inference, unless the court in
its discretion determines otherwise, but he may be examined by
any party concerning the basis for his opinion or inference
and he shall then disclose that basis.
Section 114—Court Expert.
(1) In
any action at any time the court in its discretion may, on its
own motion or at the request of any party, appoint a court
expert to inquire into and report upon any matter on which an
expert opinion or inference would be admissible under section
112.
(2)
Unless otherwise ordered by the court, the report of the court
expert shall be made to the court in writing together with
such number of copies as the court may require and the court
shall make one copy of the report available to each party.
(3)
The report of the court expert shall be admissible to the same
extent as the testimony of any other expert witness and shall
to that extent be deemed to be in evidence without formal
introduction by the court or any party.
(4)
Whether called as a witness by the court or a party, the court
expert may be cross-examined by any party, including the party
calling the court expert.
(5)
The court expert shall if possible be a person agreed between
the parties, and failing agreement shall be nominated by the
court.
(6)
The matters to be submitted to the court expert shall if
possible be agreed between the parties and the court, and
failing agreement shall be settled by the court.
(7)
The court expert may conduct such experiments and tests as he
deems appropriate and he may communicate with the parties to
arrange for the attendance of any person or the provision of
samples or information or any similar matter; and failing
agreement between the parties and court expert as to any of
these matters, they shall be determined by the court.
(8)
The court expert appointed under this section is entitled to
reasonable remuneration as determined by the court.
(9)
The remuneration of the court expert shall be taxed as costs
to the parties.
(10)
If it is necessary or appropriate to pay the court expert any
or all of his remuneration before costs are taxed, without
prejudice to the ultimate taxation of costs and unless
otherwise ordered by the court, in a civil action each party
shall contribute a pro rata share of such remuneration and
shall be jointly and severally liable for the whole
remuneration, and in a criminal action the prosecution shall
contribute the whole remuneration.
Section 115—Opinion on Ultimate Issue.
Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference admissible
under section 111 or 112 shall not be inadmissible because the
opinion or inference concerns an ultimate issue to be decided
by the tribunal of fact.
PART
VIII—HEARSAY
Section 116—Hearsay Defined.
For the purpose of this Part
(a) a "statement" is an oral or written
expression, or conduct of a person intended by him as a
substitute for oral or written expression;
(b) a "declarant" is a person who makes a
statement;
(c) "hearsay evidence" is evidence of a
statement, other than a statement made by a witness while
testifying in the action at the trial, offered to prove the
truth of the matter stated;
(d) a "hearsay statement" is a statement
evidence of which is hearsay evidence;
(e) "unavailable as a witness" means that
the declarant is:
(i) exempted or precluded on the ground of
privilege from testifying concerning the matter to which his
statement is relevant; or
(ii) disqualified as a witness from
testifying to the matter; or
(iii) dead or unable to attend or testify
at the trial because of a then existing physical or mental
condition; or
(iv) absent from the trial and the court is
unable to compel his attendance by its process; or
(v) absent from the trial and the proponent
of his statement has exercised reasonable diligence but has
been unable to procure his attendance by the court's process;
or,
(vi) in such a position that he cannot
reasonably be expected in the circumstances (including the
lapse of time since the statement was made) to have any,
recollection of matters relevant to determining the accuracy
of the statement in question.
(f) "available as a witness" means that
the declarant is not unavailable as a witness.
Section 117—Hearsay not Admissible.
Hearsay evidence is not admissible except as otherwise
provided by this Decree or any other enactment or by agreement
of the parties.
Section 118—First Hand Hearsay.
(1)
Evidence of a hearsay statement is not made inadmissible by
section 117 if—
(a) the statement made by the declarant
would be admissible had it been made while testifying in the
action and would not itself be hearsay evidence, and
(b) the declarant is:
(i) unavailable as a witness, or
(ii) a witness, or will be a witness,
subject to cross-examination concerning the hearsay statement;
or
(iii) available as a witness and the party
offering the evidence, has given reasonable notice to the
court and every other party of his intention to offer the
hearsay statement at the trial and that notice gave sufficient
particulars (including the contents of the statement, to whom
it was made, and, if known, when and where) to afford a
reasonable opportunity to estimate the value of the statement
in the action.
(2)
In a criminal action where the prosecution offers evidence
under clause (b) (iii) of subsection (1) of this section, the
evidence shall not be admissible if an accused has given
reasonable notice to the court and the prosecution that he
objects to its admission.
(3)
Nothing in this section shall preclude the prosecution from
offering such evidence under any other clause of subsection
(1) of this section or under any other provision of this
Decree.
(4)
In a criminal action evidence of a hearsay statement made by
an accused shall not be admissible under subsection (1) of
this section when offered by the accused unless the accused is
or will be a witness subject to cross-examination concerning
the hearsay statement.
(5)
Evidence of a hearsay statement offered under clause (b) (i)
of subsection (1) of this section shall not be admissible if
the declarant is unavailable as a witness because the
exemption, preclusion, disqualification, death, inability,
absence or failure of recollection of the declarant was
brought about by the wrongdoing of the proponent of his
statement for the purpose of preventing the declarant from
attending or testifying.
Section 119—Admissions.
Evidence of a hearsay statement is not made inadmissible by
section 117 if the statement is offered against a party, and—
(a) the declarant is a party to the action
either in his individual or representative capacity, or
(b) the party against whom it is offered
has manifested his adoption of, or his belief in the truth of,
the statement, or
(c) the party against whom it is offered
had authorised the declarant to make a statement concerning
the subject matter of the statement, or
(d) the declarant was an agent or employee
of the party against whom it is offered and the statement
concerns a matter within the scope of the declarant's agency
or employment and was made before the termination of the
agency or employment, or
(e) the declarant made the statement while
participating in a conspiracy to commit a crime or civil wrong
and in furtherance of that conspiracy.
Section 120—Confessions.
(1) In
a criminal action, evidence of a hearsay statement made by an
accused admitting matter which—
(a) constitutes; or
(b) forms an essential part of; or
(c) taken together with other information
already disclosed by him is a basis for an inference of,
the
commission of a crime for which he is being tried in the
action is not admissible against him unless the statement was
made voluntarily.
(2)
Evidence of a hearsay statement shall not be admissible under
subsection (1) if the statement was made by the declarant
while arrested, restricted or detained by the State unless the
statement was made in the presence of an independent witness
(other than a police officer or member of the Armed Forces)
approved by the accused.
(3)
The independent witness must be a person who—
(a) can understand the language spoken by
accused;
(b) can read and understand the language in
which the statement is made,
and
where the statement is in writing the independent witness must
certify in writing that the statement was made voluntarily in
his presence and that the contents were fully understood by
the accused.
(4)
Where the accused is blind or illiterate, the independent
witness shall carefully read over and explain to him the
contents of the statement before it is signed or marked by the
accused, and shall certify in writing on the statement that he
had so read over and explained its contents to the accused and
that the accused appeared perfectly to understand it before it
was signed or marked.
(5)
For the purpose of this section a statement that was not made
voluntarily includes, but is not limited to, a statement made
by the accused if—
(a) the accused when making the statement
was not capable, because of a physical or mental condition, of
understanding what he said or did; or
(b) the accused was induced to make
statement by being subjected to cruel or inhuman conditions,
or by the infliction of physical suffering upon him by a
public official, or by a person who has a direct interest in
the outcome of the action, or by a person acting at the
request or direction of a public official or such interested
person; or
(c) the accused was induced to make the
statement by a threat or promise which was likely to cause him
to make such a statement falsely, and the person making the
threat or promise was a public official, or a person who has a
direct interest in the outcome of the action, or a person
acting at the request or direction of public official or such
an interested person.
(6)
in a criminal action tried by a jury a party may not, in the
presence of the jury, offer to prove a hearsay statement under
this section.
(7)
When a party offers to prove a hearsay statement under this
section the court shall, in the absence of the jury, determine
the admissibility of the statement as provided in section 3.
(8) A
determination by the court under subsection (7) that a
statement is admissible shall not preclude the jury from
determining that the statement is not to be believed.
Section 121—Former Testimony.
Evidence of a hearsay statement is not made inadmissible by
section 117 if it consists of testimony given by the declarant
as a witness in an action or in a deposition taken according
to law for use in an action, and when the testimony was given
or the deposition was taken the declarant was examined by a
party with interests and motives identical with, or similar
to, the party against whom the evidence is offered in the
present action.
Section 122—Past Recollection Recorded.
Evidence of a hearsay statement is not made inadmissible by
section 117 if—
(a) the statement is contained in a writing
and constitutes a record of what was perceived by a witness
who is present and subject to cross-examination; and
(b) the statement would have been
admissible if made by the witness while testifying; and
(c) at a time when the matter recorded was
recently perceived and clear in his memory, the witness
recognised the written statement as an accurate record of what
he had perceived or the witness stated what he perceived and
the written statement, by whomever or however made, correctly
sets forth what the witness stated.
Section 123—State of Mind.
Evidence of a hearsay statement is not made inadmissible by
section 117 if the statement states the declarant's existing
state of mind, emotion or physical sensation and is not a
statement of the declarant's memory or belief of a fact
offered to prove the truth of the fact remembered or believed.
Section 124—Res Gestae.
Evidence of a hearsay statement is not made inadmissible by
section 117 if the statement was made—
(a) while the declarant was perceiving the
event or condition which the statement narrates or describes
or explains or immediately thereafter; or
(b) while the declarant was under the
stress caused by his perception of the event or condition
which the statement narrates or describes or explains.
Section 125—Business Records.
(1)
Evidence of a hearsay statement contained in a writing made as
a record of an act, event, condition, opinion or diagnosis is
not made inadmissible by section 117 if—
(a) the writing was made in the regular
course of a business;
(b) the writing was made at or near the
time the act or event occurred, the condition existed, the
opinion was formed, or the diagnosis was made; and
(c) the sources of the information and the
method and time of preparation were such as to indicate that
the statement contained in the writing is reasonably
trustworthy.
(2)
Evidence of the absence from records of a business of a record
of an alleged act, event or condition is not made inadmissible
by section 117 when offered to prove the non-occurrence of the
act or event, or the non-existence of the condition, if—
(a) it was the regular course of that
business to make records of all such acts, events or
conditions at or near the time the act or event occurred or
the condition existed and to preserve those records; and
(b) the sources of information and method
and time of preparation of the records of that business were
such that the absence of a record is a reasonably trustworthy
indication that the act or event did not occur or that the
condition did not exist.
(3)
For the purpose of this section a "business" includes every
type of regularly conducted activity, business, profession,
occupation, governmental activity, or operation of an
institution, whether carried on for profit or not.
(4) A
hearsay statement admissible in evidence under this section
is not made inadmissible by the fact that it is not based on
the personal knowledge of the declarant.
Section 126—Official Records.
(1)
Evidence of a hearsay statement contained in a writing made as
a record of an act, event or condition is not made
inadmissible by section 117 if—
(a) the writing was made by and within the
scope of duty of a public official;
(b) the writing was made at or near the
time the act or event occurred or the condition existed; and
(c) the sources of information and method
and time of preparation were such as to indicate that the
statement contained in the writing is reasonably trustworthy.
(2)
Evidence of a hearsay statement contained in a writing made by
the public official who is the official custodian of the
records in a public office, reciting diligent search and
failure to find a record, is not made inadmissible by section
117.
(3) A
hearsay statement admissible in evidence under this section is
not made inadmissible by the fact that it is not based on the
personal knowledge of the declarant.
Section 127—Judgments.
(1)
Evidence of a final judgment in a criminal action of a court
in Ghana adjudging a person guilty of a crime is not made
inadmissible by section 117 when offered to prove any fact
essential to the judgment.
(2)
Evidence of a final judgment of a court is not made
inadmissible by section 117 when offered by a judgment debtor
to prove any fact which was essential to the judgment in an
action in which he seeks to—
(a) recover partial or total indemnity or
exoneration for money paid or liability incurred because of
the judgment; or
(b) enforce a warranty to protect the
judgment debtor against the liability determined by the
judgment; or
(c) recover damages for breach of a
warranty substantially the same as the warranty determined by
the judgment to have been breached.
(3)
When the liability, obligation or duty of a person other than
a party is in issue in an action, evidence of a final judgment
of a court in Ghana against that person is not made
inadmissible by section 117 when offered to prove such
liability, obligation or duty.
(4) A
judgment offered in evidence and admissible under this section
is not made inadmissible by the fact that the judgment is an
opinion or is not based on personal knowledge.
Section 128—Family History.
(1)
Evidence of a hearsay statement by a declarant concerning his
own birth, marriage, divorce, relationship by blood, marriage
or adoption, ancestry or other similar fact of his family
history is not made inadmissible by section 117 and will not
be made inadmissible by the fact that the declarant had no
means of acquiring personal knowledge of the matter declared
if the statement was made before controversy arose over the
fact of family history.
(2)
Evidence of a hearsay statement concerning the birth, death,
marriage, divorce, relationship by blood, marriage or
adoption, ancestry or other similar fact of the family history
of a person other than the declarant is not made inadmissible
by section 117 if the statement was made before controversy
arose concerning the fact of family history and—
(a) the declarant was related to the other
person by blood, marriage or adoption; or
(b) the declarant was otherwise so
intimately associated with the other person's family as to be
likely to have had accurate information concerning the matter
declared.
(3)
Evidence of entries in family bibles or other family books,
family portraits, and inscriptions on buildings, tombstones
and the like is not made inadmissible by section 117 when
offered to prove the birth, death, marriage, divorce,
relationship by blood, marriage or adoption, ancestry or other
similar fact of family history of a member of the family by
blood, marriage or adoption.
(4)
Evidence of reputation among members of a family is not made
inadmissible by section 117 when offered to prove the truth of
the matter reputed if the reputation concerns the birth,
death, marriage, divorce, relationship by blood, marriage or
divorce, ancestry or other similar fact of the family history
of a member of the family by blood, marriage or adoption.
Section 129—Boundaries and Community History.
Evidence of reputation in a community given by a person with
personal knowledge of the reputation is not made inadmissible
by section 117 if—
(a) the reputation concerns boundaries of,
or customs affecting land in the community and the reputation,
if any, arose before controversy concerning the boundary or
custom; or
(b) the reputation concerns an event of the
general history of the community and the event was of
importance to the community.
Section 130—Deeds and Ancient Writings.
(1)
Evidence of a hearsay statement contained in a deed of
conveyance or a will or other writing purporting to affect an
interest in movable or immovable property is not made
inadmissible by section 117 if—
(a) the matter stated was relevant to the
purpose of the writing;
(b) the matter stated would be relevant to
an issue as to an interest in the property; and
(c) the dealings with the property since
the statement was made have not been inconsistent with the
truth of the statement.
(2)
Evidence of a hearsay statement is not made inadmissible by
section 117 if the statement is contained in a writing more
than 20 years old and the statement has since been acted upon
as true by persons having an interest in the matter.
Section 131—Reputation Concerning Character.
Evidence of a person's general reputation with reference to
his character or a trait of his character at a relevant time
in a group with which he regularly associated is not made
inadmissible by section 117 when offered to prove the truth of
the matter reputed.
Section 132—Reference Works.
(1) A
published treatise, periodical, or pamphlet on a subject of
history, literature, science or art is not made inadmissible
by section 117 when offered to prove the truth of a matter
stated therein if the court takes judicial notice, or a
witness expert in the subject testifies, that the author of
the statement in the writing is recognised in his field as an
expert in the subject.
(2)
Evidence of a hearsay statement, other than an opinion,
contained in a tabulation, list, directory, register or other
published data compilation is not made inadmissible by section
117 if the compilation is generally used and relied upon as
accurate in the regular course of a business as defined in
section 125 (3).
Section 133—Credibility of Declarant.
Whenever hearsay evidence has been admitted—
(a)
evidence of a statement or other conduct by the declarant that
is inconsistent with the declarant's hearsay statement is not
inadmissible for the purpose of attacking the credibility of
the declarant though he had no opportunity to explain or deny
the inconsistency because he was not called as a witness, and
(b)
any other evidence offered to attack or support the
credibility of the declarant is admissible if it would have
been admissible had the declarant been a witness in the
action.
Section 134—Examination of Declarant.
(1)
The declarant of a hearsay statement admitted in evidence may
be called and examined, as if under cross-examination
concerning the statement, by any party adverse to the party
who introduced the statement.
(2)
Subsection (1) shall not apply if the declarant is—
(a) a witness who has testified in the
action concerning the subject matter of the statement; or
(b) a party; or
(c) a person whose relationship to a party
makes his interest substantially the same as that of a party.
(3)
Subsection (1) shall not apply if the statement is hearsay
evidence admissible only under sections 119, 120, 121 or 127.
(4)
Hearsay evidence that is otherwise admissible is not made
inadmissible by this section because the declarant who made
the statement is unavailable for examination under this
section.
Section 135—Discretionary Exclusion if Declarant Available.
In a
criminal action tried by a jury the court, in its discretion,
may exclude evidence admissible only under sections 121, 123,
124, 128 and 130 if the circumstances in which the statement
was made are such as to indicate that it is not reasonably
trustworthy and the declarant is available as a witness.
PART
IX—AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION
Section 136—Authentication.
(1)
Where the relevancy of evidence depends upon its authenticity
or identity, so that authentication or identification is
required as a condition precedent to admission, that
requirement is satisfied by evidence or other showing
sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is
what its proponent claims.
(2)
Permissible means of authentication or identification include
but are not limited to, those provided in sections 137 to 161.
Section 137—Authentication by Admission.
Authentication may be by evidence that the party against whom
it is offered has at any time, admitted its authenticity or
identity or acted upon it as authentic.
Section 138—Authentication by Statute.
Authentication or identification may be by any means provided
by any enactment or rules of court.
Section 139—Authentication by Testimony of Witness with
Knowledge.
Authentication or identification may be by testimony that a
matter is what its proponent claims.
Section 140—Authentication by Non-Expert Opinion on
Handwriting.
To
authenticate or identify handwriting, a witness who is not an
expert on handwriting may state his opinion whether
handwriting is that of the alleged writer if the court is
satisfied that the witness has personal knowledge of the
handwriting of the alleged writer.
Section 141—Authentication by Comparison by Court or Witness.
Authentication or identification of any signature,
handwriting, seal or finger impression may be by a comparison
made by a witness or by the court with a specimen which has
been proved to the satisfaction of the court to be genuine.
Section 142—Voice Identification.
To
identify a voice, whether heard directly or through mechanical
or electronic transmission or recording, a witness who is not
an expert on voice identification may state his opinion
whether the voice is that of the alleged speaker if the court
is satisfied that the witness has at any time heard the voice
in circumstances connecting it with the alleged speaker.
Section 143—Identification by Telephone.
A
person may be identified by evidence that a telephone call was
made to a number reputed to be that of the person in question,
if—
(a) the call was to a place of business and
the conversation related to business reasonably transacted
with that person over the telephone; or
(b) circumstances, including
self-identification, show the person answering to be the one
called.
Section 144—Authentication by Distinctive Characteristics.
Authentication or identification may be by evidence of
distinctive characteristics, appearance, contents, substance
or internal patterns.
Section 145—Authentication by Reply.
Authentication or identification of a communication, whether
written or otherwise, may be by evidence that the
communication was received in response to a communication sent
to the alleged author of the communication in question.
Section 146—Ancient Documents.
Authentication or identification of a writing may be by
evidence that the writing—
(a) is in such condition as to create no
suspicion concerning its authenticity;
(b) was in a place where, if authentic, it
might be expected to be; and
(c) is at least 20 years old at the time it
is offered.
Section 147—Authentication by Process or System.
Authentication or identification may be by evidence describing
a process or system used to produce a result and showing that
the result is accurate.
Section 148—Authentication of Public Reports and Records.
Authentication or identification of a writing may be by
evidence that—
(a) the writing is a public record, report,
statement or data compilation and is from an office of a
public entity in Ghana; or
(b) the writing is one authorised by law to
be recorded or filed and has in fact been recorded or filed in
an office of a public entity in Ghana and is from an office of
a public entity in Ghana where items of that nature are
regularly kept.
Section 149—Business Records.
(1)
Authentication or identification of writings made or kept in
the regular course of a business may be by the testimony of a
representative of the business who is responsible for keeping
the records or familiar with them even though he did not make
the writing or see it made.
(2)
For the purpose of this section a "business" includes every
type of regularly conducted activity, business, profession,
occupation, governmental activity, or operation of an
institution, whether carried on for profit or not.
Section 150—Attested Writings.
(1) An
attested writing that is not required by law to be attested
may be authenticated in the same manner as any other writing
and the testimony of an attesting witness is not required.
(2) An
attested writing, other than a will or testamentary writing,
that is required by law to be attested may be authenticated in
the same manner in which it might be authenticated if no
attesting witness were alive.
Section 151—Public Publications.
Books,
pamphlets, gazettes or other publications purporting to be
printed or published by a public entity are presumed to be
authentic.
Section 152—Law Reports and Treatises.
Printed and published books of statutes or reports of the
decisions of the courts of any nation and books proved to be
commonly admitted in those courts as evidence of the law of
that nation are presumed to be authentic.
Section 153—Maps and Charts.
All
maps or charts made under the authority of a public entity,
and not made for the purpose of any litigated question, are
presumed to be authentic and correct.
Section 154—Ghana Gazette.
All
proclamations, Acts of State, whether legislative or
executive, nominations, appointments, and other official
communications appearing in the Ghana Gazette are prima facie
evidence of any fact of a public nature which they are
intended to notify.
Section 155—Reference Books.
A
reference book, text or treatise which is produced for
inspection by the court if in such condition as to create no
suspicion concerning its authenticity is presumed to be
written and published at the time and place it purports to
have been.
Section 156—Newspapers and Periodicals.
Printed materials purporting to be newspapers or periodicals
are presumed to be authentic.
Section 157—Signs and Labels.
Inscriptions, signs, tags or labels purporting to have been
affixed in the course of business and indicating ownership,
control or origin are presumed to be authentic.
Section 158—Acknowledged Writings.
Writings accompanied by a certificate of acknowledgement
bearing the signature and seal of a notary public in Ghana or
other officer in Ghana authorised by law to take
acknowledgments are presumed to be authentic.
Section 159—Seals.
A seal
is presumed to be genuine and its use authorised if it
purports to be the seal of—
(a) Ghana or of a Ministry, Department,
officer or agency of Ghana;
(b) a public entity in Ghana or a
Department, officer or agency of such a public entity;
(c) a State recognised by Ghana or a
Ministry, Department, officer or agency of such a State;
(d) a public entity in a State recognised
by Ghana or a Department, officer or agency of such a public
entity;
(e) a court in Ghana or a court in a State
recognised by Ghana;
(f) an international public entity or a
Department, officer or agency of such a public entity;
(g) a notary public or a commissioner for
oaths in Ghana.
Section 160—Domestic Official Signatures.
A
signature is presumed to be genuine and authorised if it
purports to be the signature, affixed in his official
capacity, of—
(a) a public official of Ghana;
(b) a public official of any public entity
in Ghana;
(c) a notary public or a commissioner for
oaths in Ghana.
Section 161—Foreign Official Signatures.
(1) A
signature is presumed to be genuine and authorised if it
purports to be the signature, affixed in his official
capacity, of an official of an international public entity or
a State or a public entity in a State recognised by Ghana and
the writing to which the signature is affixed is accompanied
by a certification of the genuineness of the signature and
official position of the person who executed the writing.
(2)
Such certification must be signed and sealed by a diplomatic
agent of Ghana or of a Commonwealth country who is assigned or
accredited to that country.
(3)
If reasonable opportunity has been given to all parties to
investigate the authenticity of a foreign official signature,
the court may, for good cause shown, order that it be treated
as presumptively authentic without a certification.
Section 162—Copies of Writings in Official Custody.
A copy
of a writing is presumed to be genuine if it purports to be a
copy of a writing which is authorised by law to be recorded or
filed and has in fact been recorded or filed in an office of a
public entity or which is a public record, report, statement
or data compilation if—
(a) an original or an original record is in
an office of a public entity where items of that nature are
regularly kept; and
(b) the copy is certified to be correct by
the custodian or other person authorised to make the
certification, provided that the certification must be
authenticated.
PART
X—WRITINGS
Section 163—Original Writings.
(1) An
"original" of a writing is the writing itself or any copy
intended to have the same effect by the person or persons
executing or issuing it.
(2) An
"original" of a writing which is a photograph includes the
photographic film (including a positive, negative or
photographic plate) or any print made therefrom.
(3) If
information contained in a writing is stored in a manner not
readable by sight, as in a computer or on magnetic tape, any
transcription readable by sight and proved to the satisfaction
of the court to accurately reflect the stored information, is
an "original" of that writing.
Section 164—Duplicates.
A
"duplicate" of a writing is a copy produced by a technique
that ensures an accurate reproduction of the original, and
includes a copy produced by the same impression, or from the
same matrix, or by means of photography, including
enlargements and miniatures, or by mechanical or electronic
re-recording, or by chemical reproduction, but does not
include a copy reproduced after the original by manual
handwriting or typing.
Section 165—Evidence of Content of a Writing.
Except
as otherwise provided by this Decree or any other enactment,
no evidence other than an original writing is admissible to
prove the content of a writing.
Section 166—Duplicate Sometimes Treated as Original.
A
duplicate of a writing is admissible to the same extent as an
original of that writing, unless—
(a) a genuine question is raised as to the
authenticity of the original or the duplicate; or
(b) in the circumstances it would be unfair
to admit the duplicate in lieu of the original.
Section 167—Originals Lost.
Evidence other than an original writing is admissible to the
same extent as an original to prove the content of a writing
if all originals are lost or have been destroyed, unless the
loss or destruction resulted from the fraudulent act of the
proponent of the evidence.
Section 168—Originals Unavailable by Judicial Means.
Evidence other than an original writing is admissible to the
same extent as an original to prove the content of a writing
if no original can be obtained by any available judicial
procedure or if all persons having control of an original
after receiving judicial process compelling production do not
produce it.
Section 169—Original Under Control of Opponent.
(1)
Evidence other than an original writing is admissible to the
same extent as an original to prove the content of a writing
if at a time when an original was under the control of the
opponent of the evidence the opponent was given express or
implied notice, by the pleadings or otherwise, that the
content of the writing would be a subject of proof at the
hearing, and on request at the hearing he does not produce it.
(2)
Though a writing requested by one party is produced by another
and is inspected by the party calling for it, the party
calling for the writing is not obliged to introduce it as
evidence in the action.
Section 170—Collateral Writings.
Evidence other than an original writing is admissible to the
same extent as an original to prove the content of a writing
if the content of the writing is not closely related to a
controlling issue in the action.
Section 171—Voluminous Writings.
(1)
Evidence other than an original writing is admissible to the
same extent as an original to prove the content of a writing
if the originals consist of numerous accounts of other
writings which cannot conveniently be examined in court, and
the fact to be proved is the general result of the whole.
(2)
The court may in its discretion require that such accounts or
other writings be produced in court or be produced for
inspection or copying by any adverse party.
Section 172—Immovable Writings.
Evidence other than an original writing is admissible to the
same extent as an original to prove the content of a writing
if the original is of such a nature as not to be easily moved.
Section 173—Admitted Writings.
Evidence other than an original of a writing is admissible to
the same extent as an original to prove the content of a
writing if the contents of the writing have been admitted by
the opponent of the evidence in writing or by testimony in the
action.
Section 174—Copy Sometimes Treated as Original.
A copy
of a writing is admissible to the same extent as an original
to prove the content of a writing if an original and the copy
have been produced at or before the hearing and made available
for inspection and comparison by the court, and all adverse
parties.
Section 175—Copies of Official Writings.
(1) A
copy of a writing which is authorised by law to be filed or
recorded and has in fact been filed or recorded in an office
of a public entity, or which is a public record, report,
statement or data compilation is admissible to the same extent
as an original to prove the content of the writing if—
(a) an original or an original record is in
an office of a public entity where items of that nature are
regularly kept; and
(b) the copy is certified to be correct by
the custodian or other person authorised to make the
certification and that certificate is authenticated or the
copy is testified to be a correct copy by a witness who has
compared it with an original.
(2) If
a copy which complies with subsection (1) cannot be obtained
by the exercise of reasonable diligence, other evidence of the
content of the writing is admissible to the same extent as an
original.
Section 176—Bankers Books.
(1) A
copy of a record made in the ordinary course of business by a
bank is admissible to the same extent as an original to prove
the content of the writing if the copy is testified to be a
correct copy by a witness who has compared it with an
original.
(2)
Evidence that the record was made in the regular course of
business or that the copy is a correct copy may be given by
oral testimony or affidavit by a representative of the bank.
(3) A
representative of a bank in any action to which the bank is
not a party shall not be compelled to produce the original
records of the bank or to appear as a witness concerning them
unless the court finds that fairness requires such compulsion.
(4)
The court may, on application, order a bank to allow a party
to inspect or copy any records of the bank which concern the
action, provided that reasonable advance notice is given to
the bank.
(5)
For the purposes of this section, a bank is any business
registered in Ghana as a bank.
Section 177—Extrinsic Evidence Affecting the Contents of a
Writing.
(1)
Except as otherwise provided by the rules of equity, terms set
forth in a writing intended by the party or parties to the
writing as a final expression of intention or agreement with
respect to such terms as are included in the writing may not
be contradicted by evidence of any prior declaration of
intention, of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral
agreement or declaration of intention, but may be explained or
supplemented—
(a) by evidence of consistent additional
terms unless the court finds the writing to have been intended
also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the
intention or agreement, provided that a will and a registered
writing conveying immovable property shall be deemed to be a
complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the intention
or agreement; and
(b) by a course of dealing or usage of
trade or by course of performance.
(2)
Nothing in this section precludes the admission of evidence
relevant to the interpretation of terms in a writing.
(3)
For the purpose of this section—
(a) "a course of dealing" means a sequence
of previous conduct between parties to a particular
transaction which is fairly to be regarded as establishing a
common basis of understanding for interpreting their
expressions and other conduct;
(b) "a usage of trade" means any practice
or method of dealing in a place, vocation or trade as to
justify an expectation that it will be observed with respect
to the transaction in question;
(c) "course of performance" means, in
respect only of a contract which involves repeated occasions
for performance by either party with knowledge of the nature
of the performance and opportunity for objection to it by the
other, any manner of performance accepted or acquiesced in
without objection.
PART
XI—MISCELLANEOUS
Section 178—Application.
(1)
This Decree shall apply in every action, whether civil or
criminal, and as provided in section 87 relating to
privileges.
(2)
In applying this Decree, and in particular in determining
whether and to what extent to exercise its power under section
8, the court shall have special regard to the fair application
of this Decree in respect of a party not represented by a
lawyer.
(3)
Any rule of law which provides that acts in derogation of the
common law shall be narrowly construed shall have no
application to this Decree.
(4)
This Decree shall be interpreted and applied so as to achieve
a consistent law of evidence and the most just, expeditious
and least costly administration of the law.
Section 179—Interpretation.
(1)
In this Decree, unless the context otherwise requires—
"action" includes every suit, proceeding or other matter
conducted before a court;
"burden of persuasion" has the meaning assigned to it in
section 10 (1);
"burden of producing evidence" has the meaning assigned to it
in section 11 (1);
"character" means a person's generalised disposition made up
of the aggregate of his traits, including traits of honesty,
peacefulness, temperance, skill or care and their opposites;
"committee" means a person, committee or other representative
authorised by law to protect the person or property or both of
an incompetent and to act for him in matters affecting his
person or property or both. An incompetent is a person under
disability imposed by law;
"conduct" includes all active and passive behaviour, both
verbal and non-verbal;
"court" includes the Superior Court of Judicature and all
other courts of Ghana which constitute the Judiciary;
"crime" has the meaning assigned to it in section 1 of the
Criminal Code, 1960 (Act 29);
"enactment" means any enactment including this Decree;
"essential facts" are facts which must be established to make
out a cause of action or defence as determined by substantive
law;
"evidence" means testimony, writings, material objects, or
other things presented to the senses that are offered to prove
the existence or non-existence of a fact;
"judge" means a member or members of a court conducting a
trial and includes a Magistrate;
"law"
includes constitutional, statutory, decisional and customary
law, and rules of equity;
"perceive" means to acquire knowledge through one's own
senses;
"proof" is the establishment by evidence of a requisite degree
of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the tribunal of
fact or the court;
"public entity" includes a state, a political sub-division of
a state, an organisation or association of states and any
public authority or agency thereof;
"public official" means an officer, agent, employee or other
representative of a public entity acting in the course of duty
as such officer, agent, employee or representative;
"routine practice" means a regular response to a repeated
specific situation;
"tribunal of fact" means trier of fact and includes—
(a)
the jury and
(b)
the court when the court is trying an issue of fact other than
one relating to the admissibility of evidence;
"writing" means handwriting, typewriting, printing,
photostating, photographing, mechanical or electronic
recording, and every other means of recording upon any
tangible thing any form of communication or representation,
including letters, words, pictures, sounds or symbols, or
combinations thereof.
(2) In
this Decree—
"examination by leave of the court" is such further
examination as the court may allow;
"examination-in-chief" is the first examination of a witness
by the party who called the witness;
"cross-examination" is the examination of a witness other than
by the party who called the witness;
"re-examination" is the examination of a witness by the party
who called the witness after the witness has been
cross-examined.
Section 180—Repeals and Amendments.
(1)
The English statutes specified in the Schedule to this Decree
shall cease to apply in Ghana.
(2)
The Supreme Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 1954 (L.N. 140A) are
hereby amended—
(a) by the revocation of rules 1, 4, 21, 28
and 50 to 84 of Order 37;
(b) by the revocation of Order 37A.
Section 181—Commencement.
(1)
This Decree shall come into force on the first day of January,
1976 and shall apply to all trials commenced thereafter.
(2)
For the purposes of this section—
(a) a trial commences when the first
evidence is admitted; and
(b) a re-trial is a new and separate trial.
(3) If
an appeal is taken form a trial which commenced before the
first day of January, 1976 the appellate court shall apply the
law applicable at the commencement of the trial.
SCHEDULE
ENGLISH STATUTES CEASING TO APPLY
Witnesses Act, 1806 (46 Geo. 3, c. 37);
Evidence Act, 1851 (14 and 15 Vict., c. 99);
Evidence Amendment Act, 1853 (16 and 17 Vict., c. 83);
Common
Law Procedure Act, 1854 (17 and 18 Vict., c. 125);
Evidence Further Amendment Act, 1869 (32 and 33 Vict., c. 68).
Made
this 18th day of April, 1975.
COLONEL I. K. ACHEAMPONG
Chairman of the National Redemption Council
Date
of Gazette Notification: 22nd April, 1975.
|